“Materiality Scrape” Provisions in Merger/Acquisition Agreements

Corporate Attorney Scott BleierBy: Scott Bleier

In connection with the sale of a business, the seller will typically make a series of factual representations and warranties about its business to the buyer.  The scope of these representations and warranties is often the subject of significant negotiation by legal counsel to both the buyer and seller and, invariably, one of the areas of “give and take” between the parties is determining which representations and warranties will be qualified as to the seller’s knowledge and/or materiality.  As a counterbalance to these qualifiers, buyers may attempt to introduce a provision into the merger/acquisition agreement that serves to exclude materiality, material adverse effect and similar materiality qualifiers contained in the seller’s representations and warranties for the purposes of determining post-closing indemnification.  Commonly referred to as a “materiality scrape”, this type of language reallocates indemnification risk from the buyer to the seller and should be reviewed by sellers and their legal counsel with a critical eye.

Please click here to read the full article and learn more about how materiality scrape language and can impact the sale of your business.

Comment on this post

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s